翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Semayawi Party Ethiopia
・ Semayne's case
・ SemaZen
・ Semba
・ Sembabule
・ Sembabule District
・ Sembach
・ Sembach Kaserne
・ Sembadel
・ Sembah
・ Semantic heterogeneity
・ Semantic holism
・ Semantic HTML
・ Semantic integration
・ Semantic Intelligence
Semantic interoperability
・ Semantic Interoperability Centre Europe
・ Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice
・ Semantic interpretation
・ Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition
・ Semantic knowledge management
・ Semantic layer
・ Semantic lexicon
・ Semantic loan
・ Semantic mapper
・ Semantic mapping
・ Semantic mapping (literacy)
・ Semantic mapping (statistics)
・ Semantic matching
・ Semantic MediaWiki


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Semantic interoperability : ウィキペディア英語版
Semantic interoperability

Semantics concerns the study of meanings. Semantic interoperability is the ability of computer systems to exchange data with unambiguous, shared meaning. Semantic interoperability is a requirement to enable machine computable logic, inferencing, knowledge discovery, and data federation between information systems.〔NCOIC, ("SCOPE" ), (''Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium'' ), 2008〕
Semantic interoperability is therefore concerned not just with the packaging of data (syntax), but the simultaneous transmission of the meaning with the data (semantics). This is accomplished by adding data about the data (metadata), linking each data element to a controlled, shared vocabulary. The meaning of the data is transmitted with the data itself, in one self-describing "information package" that is independent of any information system. It is this shared vocabulary, and its associated links to an ontology, which provides the foundation and capability of machine interpretation, inferencing, and logic.
Syntactic interoperability is a prerequisite for semantic interoperability. Syntactic interoperability refers to the packaging and transmission mechanisms for data. In healthcare, HL7 has been in use for over thirty years (which predates the internet and web technology), and uses the unix pipe (|) as a data delimiter. The current internet standard for document markup is XML, which uses "< >" as a data delimiter. The data delimiters convey no meaning to the data other than to structure the data. Without a data dictionary to translate the contents of the delimiters, the data remains meaningless. While there are many attempts at creating data dictionaries and information models to associate with these data packaging mechanisms, none have been practical to implement. This has only perpetuated the ongoing "babelization" of data and inability to exchange of data with meaning.
Since the introduction of the Semantic Web concept by Tim Berners-Lee in 1999, there has been growing interest and application of the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium, WWWC) standards to provide web-scale semantic data exchange, federation, and inferencing capabilities.
== Semantic as a function of syntactic interoperability ==

Syntactic interoperability, provided by for instance XML or the SQL standards, is a pre-requisite to semantic. It involves a common data format and common protocol to structure any data so that the manner of processing the information will be interpretable from the structure. It also allows detection of syntactic errors, thus allowing receiving systems to request resending of any message that appears to be garbled or incomplete. No semantic communication is possible if the syntax is garbled or unable to represent the data. However, information represented in one syntax may in some cases be accurately translated into a different syntax. Where accurate translation of syntaxes is possible, systems using different syntaxes may also interoperate accurately. In some cases the ability to accurately translate information among systems using different syntaxes may be limited to one direction, when the formalisms used have different levels of ''expressivity'' (ability to express information). The idea of ''semantic proximity'' to specify degree of ''semantic similarity'' to achieve interoperability of objects (in the context of database systems) was first discussed in a paper titled ″So Far (Schematically) yet So Near (Semantically)″〔Sheth, A. P.,& Kashyap, V. (1993). So Far (Schematically) yet So Near (Semantically). Proceedings of the IFIP WG2.6 Database Semantics Conference on Interoperable Database Systems, 283-312.〕 published in 1993.
A single ontology containing representations of every term used in every application is generally considered impossible, because of the rapid creation of new terms or assignments of new meanings to old terms. However, though it is impossible to anticipate ''every'' concept that a user may wish to represent in a computer, there is the possibility of finding some finite set of "primitive" concept representations that can be combined to create any of the more specific concepts that users may need for any given set of applications or ontologies. Having a foundation ontology (also called ''upper ontology'') that contains all those primitive elements would provide a sound basis for general semantic interoperability, and allow users to define any new terms they need by using the basic inventory of ontology elements, and still have those newly defined terms properly interpreted by any other computer system that can interpret the basic foundation ontology. Whether the number of such primitive concept representations is in fact finite, or will expand indefinitely, is a question under active investigation. If it is finite, then a stable foundation ontology suitable to support accurate and general semantic interoperability can evolve after some initial foundation ontology has been tested and used by a wide variety of users. At the present time, no foundation ontology has been adopted by a wide community, so such a stable foundation ontology is still in the future.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Semantic interoperability」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.